Anthropology, as a discipline, has undergone many changes in recent years. As the LESC adapts to these changes, it continues to draw on its historic principles: first, a broad, comparative perspective and, second, an emphasis on long-term fieldwork that in turn contributes to theoretical discussions.
A generalist scope: Thanks to its comparative perspective and its broad inventory of societal forms and cultural diversity, the LESC contributes to a critical knowledge on the characteristics univeral to all humans. One such characteristic – though it is not unique to humans – is the ability to organize themselves into societies, and to form mental representations of themselves in society. This perspective is bolstered by the laboratory's size and flexible organisation; the large number of researchers facilitates thematic reinterpretations and innovation.
A scientific practice constantly combining fieldwork and theoretical elaboration: Since its foundation, the LESC has stressed long-term fieldwork, which includes learning the local language(s) and, if possible, returning to the field repeatedly; the materials collected over years, if not decades, serve to build theory. The primacy accorded to fieldwork and to the production and preservation of ethnographic material and data – a top priority of the Éric-de-Dampierre Library – is consistent with with a (non-exclusive) emphasis on remote locations.
In its quest for rigorous ethnographic description and interpretive models drawn from comparative sociology and social anthropology, the LESC places great importance on analysing forms of social organization and on interpreting systems of representation found on all five continents. Ethnographic methods are becoming more diverse, and now include tools from interactionist sociography, quantitative methods, and experimental models inspired by the cognitive sciences. Still, institutions of all types remain a central concern of the LESC.
Mastery of the local language(s) is prioritised, whether they have a standardized writing system or not. Within the LESC, there has long been a fertile dialogue between ethnology and linguistics, in particular ethnolinguistics, including recent developments in linguistic pragmatics and the cognitive sciences. The EREA, in particular, is interested in these fields; the ethnomusicologists at the CREM, on the other hand, favour a cognitive approach.
History has long been a central concern of LESC researchers: the comparative exercise begins with contemporary materials, but analyses them through a historical lens, including the context in which they were collected. Diachronic comparison can reveal structural changes and continuity, and also the means of transmission or rupture that organize the perpetuation and the transformations of societies and cultures.
Interdisciplinary dialogue is intensifying and opening new areas of study on the edges of established knowledge. The LESC participates in this movement by forging crossdisciplinary research topics with geography, political science, psychology, and life sciences, and is opening new fields of study that intersect with the history of science, the anthropology of art and technology, museography, and even robotics.
The LESC is working to transform anthropological knowledge and redefine anthropology’s intellectual sphere, and, furthermore, hopes to contribute to ongoing epistemological inquiry and research in the discipline.